Nirmal Krida And Samaj Prabodhan Trust
Art's Science & Commerce College, Badnapur. Estd. 1997
Nirmal Campus, Highway No: 06,
Aurangabad-Jalna Road, Badnapur Dist. Jalna 431202, Maharashtra, India.
Accrediated by NAAC with B+ Grade, Recognized by UGC And Goverment of Maharashtra, India.
Affiliated to Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad.
Criteria II
| Qlm / Qnm No. | Name of Qlm / Qnm | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.1 | Enrolment Number Number of students admitted during the year | View Document |
| 2.1.2 | Number of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the year (exclusive of supernumerary seats) | View Document |
| 2.2.1 | The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organizes special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners | View Document |
| 2.2.2 | Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | View Document |
| 2.3.1 | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences | View Document |
| 2.3.2 | Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process | View Document |
| 2.3.3 | Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year ) | View Document |
| 2.4.1 | Number of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the year | View Document |
| 2.4.2 | Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Super speciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the year(consider only highest degree for count) | View Document |
| 2.4.3 | Number of years of teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year) | View Document |
| 2.5.1 | Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode | View Document |
| 2.5.2 | Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient | View Document |
| 2.6.1 | Teachers and students are aware of the stated Programme and course outcomes of the Programmes offered by the institution. | View Document |
| 2.6.2 | Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution. | View Document |
| 2.6.3 | Pass percentage of Students during the year | View Document |
| 2.7.1 | Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) on overall institutional performance (Institution may design its own questionnaire) (results and details need to be provided as a weblink) | View Document |
| 2.1.1 | Enrolment Number Number of students admitted during the year | View Document |
| 2.1.2 | Number of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the year (exclusive of supernumerary seats) | View Document |
| 2.2.1 | The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organizes special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners | View Document |
| 2.2.2 | Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | View Document |
| 2.3.1 | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences | View Document |
| 2.3.2 | Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process | View Document |
| 2.3.3 | Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year ) | View Document |
| 2.4.1 | Number of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the year | View Document |
| 2.4.2 | Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Super speciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the year(consider only highest degree for count) | View Document |
| 2.4.3 | Number of years of teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year) | View Document |
| 2.5.1 | Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode | View Document |
| 2.5.2 | Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient | View Document |
| 2.6.1 | Teachers and students are aware of the stated Programme and course outcomes of the Programmes offered by the institution. | View Document |
| 2.6.2 | Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution. | View Document |
| 2.6.3 | Pass percentage of Students during the year | View Document |
| 2.7.1 | Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) on overall institutional performance (Institution may design its own questionnaire) (results and details need to be provided as a weblink) | View Document |